DST = big fat waste
Posted by Nate in Ideas, Politics.
Wednesday, April 4th, 2007 at 10:40 am
Turns out — predictably — that the energy conserving plan to expand daylight saving time has fallen flat: power companies are reporting no measurable change in consumption. It seems tempting to chalk this up to a "good try", but all signs point to congress knowing it wouldn’t conserve energy — Australia had tried a similar scheme and got no results — but passing it anyway for economic reasons. Apparently sporting goods stores and convenience stores both benefit from lighter evenings, and via wikipedia I read "both Idaho senators voted to extend DST on the basis of fast-food restaurants selling more French fries made from Idaho potatoes." Hmm.
Not only that, but personally this has been a big hassle for me: I had to hand patch all our servers at work so their internal clocks would get the correct time. And I’m just one guy with a few servers – the total estimated cost of the change is $500 million up to $1 billion!!
Wow. Way to save the daylight, guys. There’s an energy crisis, look busy!
Similar Posts:
- Season ender? ( October, 2006)
- Tonsillectomy: day 2 ( December, 2007)
- What to do? ( September, 2008)
- Give the earth a Hugg ( May, 2007)
- Countdown ( December, 2007)
April 4th, 2007 at 10:45 am
Oh yeah, and I didn’t bike today. The wind was terrible and nobody wants to hear that much whining… :)
April 4th, 2007 at 11:05 am
Man, that is crazy. You just tend to believe that if they say it saves energy, that it actually does. And the costs to re-do all the computers, that never gets figured in, I’m sure.
April 7th, 2007 at 11:11 am
Man, what a waste. That’s ridiculous. Is that why every time I try to change the clock on my computer it resets when I restart my computer?